On 01/11/2012 01:17 AM, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 08:43:18PM -0700, Brian Paul wrote:
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 8:59 PM, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 11:20:07AM +0800, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 08:25:31PM +0100, Roland Scheidegger wrote:
Ah index
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 08:43:18PM -0700, Brian Paul wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 8:59 PM, Yuanhan Liu
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 11:20:07AM +0800, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
> >> On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 08:25:31PM +0100, Roland Scheidegger wrote:
> >> > Ah index scanning...
> >> > I don't l
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 8:59 PM, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 11:20:07AM +0800, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 08:25:31PM +0100, Roland Scheidegger wrote:
>> > Ah index scanning...
>> > I don't like that this will map/unmap the ib once for each prim,
>> Me either :)
>
On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 07:23:24PM +0100, Roland Scheidegger wrote:
> Am 04.01.2012 04:59, schrieb Yuanhan Liu:
> > On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 11:20:07AM +0800, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
> >> On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 08:25:31PM +0100, Roland Scheidegger wrote:
> >>> Ah index scanning...
> >>> I don't like tha
Am 04.01.2012 04:59, schrieb Yuanhan Liu:
> On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 11:20:07AM +0800, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 08:25:31PM +0100, Roland Scheidegger wrote:
>>> Ah index scanning...
>>> I don't like that this will map/unmap the ib once for each prim,
>> Me either :)
>>
>>> though
Am 04.01.2012 04:20, schrieb Yuanhan Liu:
> On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 08:25:31PM +0100, Roland Scheidegger wrote:
>> Ah index scanning...
>> I don't like that this will map/unmap the ib once for each prim,
> Me either :)
>
>> though
>> I don't really see a nice way to avoid that (I think if you have
On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 11:20:07AM +0800, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 08:25:31PM +0100, Roland Scheidegger wrote:
> > Ah index scanning...
> > I don't like that this will map/unmap the ib once for each prim,
> Me either :)
>
> > though
> > I don't really see a nice way to avoid th
On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 08:25:31PM +0100, Roland Scheidegger wrote:
> Ah index scanning...
> I don't like that this will map/unmap the ib once for each prim,
Me either :)
> though
> I don't really see a nice way to avoid that (I think if you have to
Well, I thought a while, we may do some combine
Ah index scanning...
I don't like that this will map/unmap the ib once for each prim, though
I don't really see a nice way to avoid that (I think if you have to
actually map the ib, you lose anyway). Hopefully won't hit that
performance hog often...
A comment inline.
Am 31.12.2011 07:32, schrieb
Introduce vbo_get_minmax_indices() function to handle the min/max index
computation for nr_prims(>= 1). The old code just compute the first
prim's min/max index; this would results an error rendering if user
called functions like glMultiDrawElements(). This patch servers as
fixing this issue.
As w
10 matches
Mail list logo