On Mon, Feb 09 2015, Jose Fonseca wrote:
> Just one more tweak to InterlockedExchangeAdd64 as per patch attached.
..
> With that u_test_atomic builds and passes for me both on 32 and
> 64bits.
Excellent. Thanks for the fix and for the testing report.
> Sorry for the delay. And thanks for your he
On 06/02/15 22:39, Carl Worth wrote:
On Fri, Feb 06 2015, Aaron Watry wrote:
Ignore me if this is a stupid question, but should those both be
sizeof(short)? I'd expect the first to be sizeof(char).
Not a stupid question. That was a copy-and-paste (kill-and-yank ?) bug
of mine.
Thanks for you
On Fri, Feb 06 2015, Aaron Watry wrote:
> Ignore me if this is a stupid question, but should those both be
> sizeof(short)? I'd expect the first to be sizeof(char).
Not a stupid question. That was a copy-and-paste (kill-and-yank ?) bug
of mine.
Thanks for your attention to detail. I've fixed thi
On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 1:43 PM, Carl Worth wrote:
> This provides for atomic addition, which will be used by an upcoming
> shader-cache patch. A simple test is added to "make check" as well.
>
> Note: The various O/S functions differ on whether they return the
> original value or the value after
On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 11:43 AM, Carl Worth wrote:
> This provides for atomic addition, which will be used by an upcoming
> shader-cache patch. A simple test is added to "make check" as well.
>
> Note: The various O/S functions differ on whether they return the
> original value or the value after
This provides for atomic addition, which will be used by an upcoming
shader-cache patch. A simple test is added to "make check" as well.
Note: The various O/S functions differ on whether they return the
original value or the value after the addition, so I did not provide
an add_return() macro whic
