Sounds good, is there a protocol to signify a patch isn't active anymore?
On 03/09/2016 04:37 PM, Lars Hamre wrote:
> I have not been able to force a NULL dereference, this is based off
> analyzing the code.
> Yes that is implicitly true, but if at some point the implicit
> relationship is broken,
On 03/09/2016 04:37 PM, Lars Hamre wrote:
I have not been able to force a NULL dereference, this is based off
analyzing the code.
Yes that is implicitly true, but if at some point the implicit
relationship is broken, I would
rather not have a NULL dereference.
If you do not agree, I am fine defe
I have not been able to force a NULL dereference, this is based off
analyzing the code.
Yes that is implicitly true, but if at some point the implicit relationship
is broken, I would
rather not have a NULL dereference.
If you do not agree, I am fine deferring to your judgement!
On Wed, Mar 9, 201
On 03/09/2016 10:21 AM, Lars Hamre wrote:
> Fixes a possible null dereference.
>
> NOTE: this is my first time contributing, please let me know if I
> should be doing anything differently, thanks!
>
> Signed-off-by: Lars Hamre
> ---
> src/mesa/swrast/s_triangle.c | 7 ---
> 1 file cha
On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 10:21 AM, Lars Hamre wrote:
> Fixes a possible null dereference.
>
> NOTE: this is my first time contributing, please let me know if I
> should be doing anything differently, thanks!
Welcome to mesa-dev Lars.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lars Hamre
> ---
> src/mesa/swrast/s_t
Fixes a possible null dereference.
NOTE: this is my first time contributing, please let me know if I
should be doing anything differently, thanks!
Signed-off-by: Lars Hamre
---
src/mesa/swrast/s_triangle.c | 7 ---
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/mesa
