On 17/09/15 10:58, Thomas Hellstrom wrote:
On 09/17/2015 11:53 AM, Thomas Hellstrom wrote:
On 09/17/2015 11:34 AM, Jose Fonseca wrote:
On 16/09/15 14:04, Thomas Hellstrom wrote:
XA has been using L8_UNORM for a8 and yuv component surfaces.
This commit instead makes XA prefer R8_UNORM since it'
On 09/17/2015 11:53 AM, Thomas Hellstrom wrote:
> On 09/17/2015 11:34 AM, Jose Fonseca wrote:
>> On 16/09/15 14:04, Thomas Hellstrom wrote:
>>> XA has been using L8_UNORM for a8 and yuv component surfaces.
>>> This commit instead makes XA prefer R8_UNORM since it's assumed to
>>> have a
>>> higher
On 09/17/2015 11:34 AM, Jose Fonseca wrote:
> On 16/09/15 14:04, Thomas Hellstrom wrote:
>> XA has been using L8_UNORM for a8 and yuv component surfaces.
>> This commit instead makes XA prefer R8_UNORM since it's assumed to
>> have a
>> higher availability.
>>
>> Also neither of these formats are s
On 16/09/15 14:04, Thomas Hellstrom wrote:
XA has been using L8_UNORM for a8 and yuv component surfaces.
This commit instead makes XA prefer R8_UNORM since it's assumed to have a
higher availability.
Also neither of these formats are suitable as destination formats using
destination alpha blendi
On 09/16/2015 07:04 AM, Thomas Hellstrom wrote:
XA has been using L8_UNORM for a8 and yuv component surfaces.
This commit instead makes XA prefer R8_UNORM since it's assumed to have a
higher availability.
Also neither of these formats are suitable as destination formats using
destination alpha b
XA has been using L8_UNORM for a8 and yuv component surfaces.
This commit instead makes XA prefer R8_UNORM since it's assumed to have a
higher availability.
Also neither of these formats are suitable as destination formats using
destination alpha blending, so reject those operations.
Signed-off-b
