On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 4:44 PM, Tom Stellard wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 04:35:03PM -0400, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 4:27 PM, Dave Airlie wrote:
>> > On 26 March 2015 at 06:07, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
>> >> So what do you do when someone goes to shadertoy.com which on
>>
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 04:35:03PM -0400, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 4:27 PM, Dave Airlie wrote:
> > On 26 March 2015 at 06:07, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> >> So what do you do when someone goes to shadertoy.com which on
> >> average uses 1000 temps?
> >
> > Fall over in a heap, li
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 4:27 PM, Dave Airlie wrote:
> On 26 March 2015 at 06:07, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
>> So what do you do when someone goes to shadertoy.com which on
>> average uses 1000 temps?
>
> Fall over in a heap, like every other driver on shadertoy,
nouveau (nv50/nvc0) tends to do pret
On 26 March 2015 at 06:07, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> So what do you do when someone goes to shadertoy.com which on
> average uses 1000 temps?
Fall over in a heap, like every other driver on shadertoy,
This would be raelly bad for r600g in its present state, since it
doesn't go TGSI->SB yet, and t
So what do you do when someone goes to shadertoy.com which on
average uses 1000 temps?
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 3:21 PM, Brian Paul wrote:
> The problem is, our binary shader interface only supports 32 temps at this
> time. We sometimes bump into that limit as-is.
>
> -Brian
>
>
> On 03/25/20
The problem is, our binary shader interface only supports 32 temps at
this time. We sometimes bump into that limit as-is.
-Brian
On 03/25/2015 01:04 PM, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
Yes, more temp registers and more instructions. But presumably the
backend has an optimization pass that is at least as g
Yes, more temp registers and more instructions. But presumably the
backend has an optimization pass that is at least as good as this one
(hopefully better!). Is that not the case for vmware?
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 2:59 PM, Brian Paul wrote:
> Will removing this pass have much effect on the numbe
Will removing this pass have much effect on the number of temp regs
used? It looks like more instructions may be emitted w/out this pass.
We're kind of sensitive to that in the VMware driver.
-Brian
On 03/25/2015 12:16 PM, Marek Olšák wrote:
Reviewed-by: Marek Olšák
I might need to wait fo
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 2:16 PM, Marek Olšák wrote:
> Reviewed-by: Marek Olšák
>
> I might need to wait for other people's opinion too.
I guess technically a2xx backend might suffer.. not even really sure
about that, but meh. We can probably eventually do
tgsi->nir->optimize->tgsi if it was tha
Reviewed-by: Marek Olšák
I might need to wait for other people's opinion too.
Marek
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 6:34 PM, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> It's buggy and unnecessary in the presence of optimizing backends. The
> only backend that will suffer is nv30, but... meh.
>
> Bugzilla: https://bugs.freed
It's buggy and unnecessary in the presence of optimizing backends. The
only backend that will suffer is nv30, but... meh.
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89759
Signed-off-by: Ilia Mirkin
---
src/mesa/state_tracker/st_glsl_to_tgsi.cpp | 199 -
1
11 matches
Mail list logo
