On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 10:12 AM Brian Paul wrote:
>
> On 12/19/2018 06:47 AM, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 8:38 AM Brian Paul wrote:
> >>
> >> On 12/18/2018 08:50 PM, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> >>> Not sure if this ever worked, but the current logic for setting the
> >>> min/max inde
Fix looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Roland Scheidegger
Am 19.12.18 um 04:50 schrieb Ilia Mirkin:
> Not sure if this ever worked, but the current logic for setting the
> min/max index is definitely wrong for indexed draws. While we're at it,
> bring in all the usual logic from the non-indirect dr
On 12/19/2018 06:47 AM, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 8:38 AM Brian Paul wrote:
>>
>> On 12/18/2018 08:50 PM, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
>>> Not sure if this ever worked, but the current logic for setting the
>>> min/max index is definitely wrong for indexed draws. While we're at it,
>>> br
On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 8:38 AM Brian Paul wrote:
>
> On 12/18/2018 08:50 PM, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> > Not sure if this ever worked, but the current logic for setting the
> > min/max index is definitely wrong for indexed draws. While we're at it,
> > bring in all the usual logic from the non-indirec
On 12/18/2018 08:50 PM, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> Not sure if this ever worked, but the current logic for setting the
> min/max index is definitely wrong for indexed draws. While we're at it,
> bring in all the usual logic from the non-indirect drawing path.
>
> Bugzilla:
> https://na01.safelinks.prot
Not sure if this ever worked, but the current logic for setting the
min/max index is definitely wrong for indexed draws. While we're at it,
bring in all the usual logic from the non-indirect drawing path.
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109086
Signed-off-by: Ilia Mirkin
---
