On Fri, Feb 3, 2017, at 06:33, Dave Airlie wrote:
> On 3 February 2017 at 13:35, Dave Airlie wrote:
> > From: Dave Airlie
> >
> > If we have an indirect index here we need to scale it by attribute slots
> > e.g. is this is vec2[256] then we get an indir_index in the 0.255 range
> > but the vec2
On 3 February 2017 at 13:35, Dave Airlie wrote:
> From: Dave Airlie
>
> If we have an indirect index here we need to scale it by attribute slots
> e.g. is this is vec2[256] then we get an indir_index in the 0.255 range
> but the vec2 are aligned inside vec4 slots. So scale the indir index,
> then
From: Dave Airlie
If we have an indirect index here we need to scale it by attribute slots
e.g. is this is vec2[256] then we get an indir_index in the 0.255 range
but the vec2 are aligned inside vec4 slots. So scale the indir index,
then extract the channels.
This appears to fix DOOM for me.
Si
