Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH] radv: always dirty the framebuffer when restoring a subpass

2019-05-27 Thread Bas Nieuwenhuizen
r-b On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 2:53 PM Samuel Pitoiset wrote: > > The old code was not wrong because the transitions performed > after the resolves should re-emit the framebuffer if needed. > > This change is mostly a no-op but it improves consistency > regarding other meta operations that need to s

[Mesa-dev] [PATCH] radv: always dirty the framebuffer when restoring a subpass

2019-05-23 Thread Samuel Pitoiset
The old code was not wrong because the transitions performed after the resolves should re-emit the framebuffer if needed. This change is mostly a no-op but it improves consistency regarding other meta operations that need to save/restore subpasses. Signed-off-by: Samuel Pitoiset --- src/amd/vul