On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 03:11:28PM -0400, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 2:06 PM, Tom Stellard wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 07:57:50PM +0200, Marek Olšák wrote:
> >> Hi Tom,
> >>
> >> This adds new calls to r600_inval_xxx_cache, which justs sets the
> >> dirty flag in the ato
Ah ok. Nevermind then.
Marek
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 8:06 PM, Tom Stellard wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 07:57:50PM +0200, Marek Olšák wrote:
>> Hi Tom,
>>
>> This adds new calls to r600_inval_xxx_cache, which justs sets the
>> dirty flag in the atom "surface_sync_cmd" to true, but I couldn't
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 2:06 PM, Tom Stellard wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 07:57:50PM +0200, Marek Olšák wrote:
>> Hi Tom,
>>
>> This adds new calls to r600_inval_xxx_cache, which justs sets the
>> dirty flag in the atom "surface_sync_cmd" to true, but I couldn't find
>> where the compute code
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 07:57:50PM +0200, Marek Olšák wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> This adds new calls to r600_inval_xxx_cache, which justs sets the
> dirty flag in the atom "surface_sync_cmd" to true, but I couldn't find
> where the compute code calls r600_emit_atom. The proper way to emit
> dirty atoms
Hi Tom,
This adds new calls to r600_inval_xxx_cache, which justs sets the
dirty flag in the atom "surface_sync_cmd" to true, but I couldn't find
where the compute code calls r600_emit_atom. The proper way to emit
dirty atoms is in r600_state_common.c:843-845.
Marek
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 11:24
Drop the compute specific evergreen_set_buffer_sync() function and
instead use the r600_surface_sync_command atom for emitting SURFACE_SYNC
packets.
---
src/gallium/drivers/r600/evergreen_compute.c | 18 ++-
.../drivers/r600/evergreen_compute_internal.c | 111 +++
...
