Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH] r600: don't do stack workarounds for hemlock

2018-02-02 Thread Roland Scheidegger
Am 02.02.2018 um 12:16 schrieb Emil Velikov: > Hi Roland, > > On 30 January 2018 at 05:07, wrote: >> From: Roland Scheidegger >> >> By the looks of it it seems hemlock is treated separately to cypress, but >> certainly it won't need the stack workarounds cedar/redwood (and >> seemingly every ot

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH] r600: don't do stack workarounds for hemlock

2018-02-02 Thread Emil Velikov
Hi Roland, On 30 January 2018 at 05:07, wrote: > From: Roland Scheidegger > > By the looks of it it seems hemlock is treated separately to cypress, but > certainly it won't need the stack workarounds cedar/redwood (and > seemingly every other eg chip except cypress/juniper) need. > (Discovered

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH] r600: don't do stack workarounds for hemlock

2018-02-01 Thread Alex Deucher
On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 12:07 AM, wrote: > From: Roland Scheidegger > > By the looks of it it seems hemlock is treated separately to cypress, but > certainly it won't need the stack workarounds cedar/redwood (and > seemingly every other eg chip except cypress/juniper) need. > (Discovered by acci

[Mesa-dev] [PATCH] r600: don't do stack workarounds for hemlock

2018-01-29 Thread sroland
From: Roland Scheidegger By the looks of it it seems hemlock is treated separately to cypress, but certainly it won't need the stack workarounds cedar/redwood (and seemingly every other eg chip except cypress/juniper) need. (Discovered by accident.) --- src/gallium/drivers/r600/sb/sb_bc.h | 1 +