Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH] nvc0/ir: clamp the UBO index for compute on Kepler

2016-06-13 Thread Ilia Mirkin
On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 7:28 AM, Samuel Pitoiset wrote: > We already check that the address is not "too far", but we should also > clamp the UBO index in order to avoid looking at the wrong place in the > driver cb. This is a pretty rare situation though. > > Signed-off-by: Samuel Pitoiset > Cc: "

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH] nvc0/ir: clamp the UBO index for compute on Kepler

2016-06-13 Thread Samuel Pitoiset
ping On 06/03/2016 01:28 PM, Samuel Pitoiset wrote: We already check that the address is not "too far", but we should also clamp the UBO index in order to avoid looking at the wrong place in the driver cb. This is a pretty rare situation though. Signed-off-by: Samuel Pitoiset Cc: "12.0" ---

[Mesa-dev] [PATCH] nvc0/ir: clamp the UBO index for compute on Kepler

2016-06-03 Thread Samuel Pitoiset
We already check that the address is not "too far", but we should also clamp the UBO index in order to avoid looking at the wrong place in the driver cb. This is a pretty rare situation though. Signed-off-by: Samuel Pitoiset Cc: "12.0" --- src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/codegen/nv50_ir_lowering_nv