On 05/08/2015 10:35 PM, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
Over-all, I think this is on the right track, but I still don't think
it's 100% correct.
On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 12:04 AM, Tapani Pälli wrote:
On 05/08/2015 09:56 AM, Pohjolainen, Topi wrote:
On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 09:51:54AM +0300, Tapani P?
Over-all, I think this is on the right track, but I still don't think
it's 100% correct.
On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 12:04 AM, Tapani Pälli wrote:
>
>
> On 05/08/2015 09:56 AM, Pohjolainen, Topi wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 09:51:54AM +0300, Tapani P?lli wrote:
>>>
>>> This fixes bugs with spe
On 05/08/2015 09:56 AM, Pohjolainen, Topi wrote:
On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 09:51:54AM +0300, Tapani P?lli wrote:
This fixes bugs with special cases where we have arrays of
structures containing samplers or arrays of samplers.
I've verified that patch results in calculating same index value as
r
On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 09:51:54AM +0300, Tapani P?lli wrote:
> This fixes bugs with special cases where we have arrays of
> structures containing samplers or arrays of samplers.
>
> I've verified that patch results in calculating same index value as
> returned by _mesa_get_sampler_uniform_value f
This fixes bugs with special cases where we have arrays of
structures containing samplers or arrays of samplers.
I've verified that patch results in calculating same index value as
returned by _mesa_get_sampler_uniform_value for IR. Patch makes
following ES3 conformance test pass:
ES3-CTS
