Hi Eric,
Sorry for not responding to this in a while. I'm replying to this
comment instead of the new version because it has the relevant
discussion.
On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 7:30 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
> Connor Abbott writes:
>
>> I mentioned this on IRC, but it would be good to add the ability
Connor Abbott writes:
> I mentioned this on IRC, but it would be good to add the ability to
> append the sequence of instructions before/after an instruction as
> well as at the beginning or end of a basic block. We would need to
> store the current basic block, the current instruction, and an en
On Friday, January 30, 2015 07:27:50 PM Connor Abbott wrote:
> I mentioned this on IRC, but it would be good to add the ability to
> append the sequence of instructions before/after an instruction as
> well as at the beginning or end of a basic block. We would need to
> store the current basic bloc
I mentioned this on IRC, but it would be good to add the ability to
append the sequence of instructions before/after an instruction as
well as at the beginning or end of a basic block. We would need to
store the current basic block, the current instruction, and an enum
consisting of "insert before
v2: Rebase on the nir_opcodes.h python code generation support.
v3: Use SSA values, and set an appropriate writemask on dot products.
v4: Make the arguments be SSA references as well. This lets you stack up
expressions in the arguments of other expressions, at the cost of
having to insert
