Quoting Emil Velikov (2018-02-16 14:07:26)
> On 16 February 2018 at 19:08, Alexander von Gluck IV
> wrote:
> > February 16, 2018 11:49 AM, "Emil Velikov" wrote:
> >> Hi Alexander,
> >>
> >> Did you drop the ball on the autotools patches? I could re-spin them
> >> but have no way to test.
> >
> >
Quoting Emil Velikov (2018-02-16 14:21:52)
> On 16 February 2018 at 22:12, Dylan Baker wrote:
> > Quoting Emil Velikov (2018-02-16 13:55:06)
> >> On 16 February 2018 at 19:28, Dylan Baker wrote:
> >> > Quoting Alexander von Gluck IV (2018-02-16 11:08:33)
> >> >> February 16, 2018 11:49 AM, "Emil
On 16 February 2018 at 22:12, Dylan Baker wrote:
> Quoting Emil Velikov (2018-02-16 13:55:06)
>> On 16 February 2018 at 19:28, Dylan Baker wrote:
>> > Quoting Alexander von Gluck IV (2018-02-16 11:08:33)
>> >> February 16, 2018 11:49 AM, "Emil Velikov"
>> >> wrote:
>> >> > Hi Alexander,
>> >> >
Quoting Emil Velikov (2018-02-16 13:55:06)
> On 16 February 2018 at 19:28, Dylan Baker wrote:
> > Quoting Alexander von Gluck IV (2018-02-16 11:08:33)
> >> February 16, 2018 11:49 AM, "Emil Velikov"
> >> wrote:
> >> > Hi Alexander,
> >> >
> >> > Did you drop the ball on the autotools patches? I
On 16 February 2018 at 19:08, Alexander von Gluck IV
wrote:
> February 16, 2018 11:49 AM, "Emil Velikov" wrote:
>> Hi Alexander,
>>
>> Did you drop the ball on the autotools patches? I could re-spin them
>> but have no way to test.
>
> I've been focused on meson since it's the future.
> Feel free
On 16 February 2018 at 19:28, Dylan Baker wrote:
> Quoting Alexander von Gluck IV (2018-02-16 11:08:33)
>> February 16, 2018 11:49 AM, "Emil Velikov" wrote:
>> > Hi Alexander,
>> >
>> > Did you drop the ball on the autotools patches? I could re-spin them
>> > but have no way to test.
>>
>> I've b
Quoting Emil Velikov (2018-02-16 10:46:59)
> On 16 February 2018 at 17:58, Dylan Baker wrote:
> > Emil,
> >
> > If meson is going to work for their needs it seems silly to merge autotools
> > support, when the plan is to drop autotools from mesa in the coming year.
> >
> What's wrong with having i
Quoting Alexander von Gluck IV (2018-02-16 11:08:33)
> February 16, 2018 11:49 AM, "Emil Velikov" wrote:
> > Hi Alexander,
> >
> > Did you drop the ball on the autotools patches? I could re-spin them
> > but have no way to test.
>
> I've been focused on meson since it's the future.
> Feel free t
February 16, 2018 11:49 AM, "Emil Velikov" wrote:
> Hi Alexander,
>
> Did you drop the ball on the autotools patches? I could re-spin them
> but have no way to test.
I've been focused on meson since it's the future.
Feel free to re-spin them if you have the bandwidth.
> There's a couple of comm
On 16 February 2018 at 17:58, Dylan Baker wrote:
> Emil,
>
> If meson is going to work for their needs it seems silly to merge autotools
> support, when the plan is to drop autotools from mesa in the coming year.
>
What's wrong with having it until then? Comparing the two side-by-side
be that wrt
Emil,
If meson is going to work for their needs it seems silly to merge autotools
support, when the plan is to drop autotools from mesa in the coming year.
Dylan
Quoting Emil Velikov (2018-02-16 09:49:37)
> Hi Alexander,
>
> Did you drop the ball on the autotools patches? I could re-spin them
>
Hi Alexander,
Did you drop the ball on the autotools patches? I could re-spin them
but have no way to test.
There's a couple of comments inline, but nothing major.
On 16 February 2018 at 00:32, Alexander von Gluck IV
wrote:
> --- a/meson.build
> +++ b/meson.build
> gl_priv_libs = []
> -if d
---
include/meson.build| 8 +
meson.build| 18 +++
src/egl/meson.build| 34 -
src/gallium/meson.build| 9 ++
src/gallium/state_trackers/hgl/meso
13 matches
Mail list logo
