On 04/06/15 14:02, Jose Fonseca wrote:
On 04/06/15 11:53, Jose Fonseca wrote:
On 04/06/15 11:23, Martin Peres wrote:
On 04/06/15 13:07, Jose Fonseca wrote:
On 04/06/15 10:56, Martin Peres wrote:
On 04/06/15 12:53, Jose Fonseca wrote:
On 31/05/15 08:10, Tapani wrote:
I've read this a couple
On 04/06/15 11:53, Jose Fonseca wrote:
On 04/06/15 11:23, Martin Peres wrote:
On 04/06/15 13:07, Jose Fonseca wrote:
On 04/06/15 10:56, Martin Peres wrote:
On 04/06/15 12:53, Jose Fonseca wrote:
On 31/05/15 08:10, Tapani wrote:
I've read this a couple of times now and cannot spot any users
On 04/06/15 11:23, Martin Peres wrote:
On 04/06/15 13:07, Jose Fonseca wrote:
On 04/06/15 10:56, Martin Peres wrote:
On 04/06/15 12:53, Jose Fonseca wrote:
On 31/05/15 08:10, Tapani wrote:
I've read this a couple of times now and cannot spot any users of
storage that would be making a wrong
On 04/06/15 13:07, Jose Fonseca wrote:
On 04/06/15 10:56, Martin Peres wrote:
On 04/06/15 12:53, Jose Fonseca wrote:
On 31/05/15 08:10, Tapani wrote:
I've read this a couple of times now and cannot spot any users of
storage that would be making a wrong assumption, you've fixed these
and
I t
On 04/06/15 10:56, Martin Peres wrote:
On 04/06/15 12:53, Jose Fonseca wrote:
On 31/05/15 08:10, Tapani wrote:
I've read this a couple of times now and cannot spot any users of
storage that would be making a wrong assumption, you've fixed these and
I trust Jenkins was OK for i915?
Everything
On 04/06/15 12:53, Jose Fonseca wrote:
On 31/05/15 08:10, Tapani wrote:
I've read this a couple of times now and cannot spot any users of
storage that would be making a wrong assumption, you've fixed these and
I trust Jenkins was OK for i915?
Everything is ok if you remove 'I think' and 'Hopef
On 31/05/15 08:10, Tapani wrote:
I've read this a couple of times now and cannot spot any users of
storage that would be making a wrong assumption, you've fixed these and
I trust Jenkins was OK for i915?
Everything is ok if you remove 'I think' and 'Hopefully' from commit
message :)
Martin's
I've read this a couple of times now and cannot spot any users of
storage that would be making a wrong assumption, you've fixed these and
I trust Jenkins was OK for i915?
Everything is ok if you remove 'I think' and 'Hopefully' from commit
message :)
Reviewed-by: Tapani Pälli
On 05/26/20
This change introduces a new field in gl_uniform_storage to
explicitely say that a uniform is built-in. In the case where it is,
no storage is defined to make it clear that it is read-only from the
mesa side. I think I fixed all the places in the code that made use of
the structure that I changed.
