On 4 January 2012 11:38, Ian Romanick wrote:
> On 01/03/2012 10:35 PM, Paul Berry wrote:
>
>> It is not explicitly stated in the GL 3.0 spec that transform feedback
>> can be performed on a whole varying array (without supplying a
>> subscript). However, it seems clear from context that this was
On 01/03/2012 10:35 PM, Paul Berry wrote:
It is not explicitly stated in the GL 3.0 spec that transform feedback
can be performed on a whole varying array (without supplying a
subscript). However, it seems clear from context that this was the
intent. Section 2.15 (TransformFeedback) says this:
On 01/03/2012 10:35 PM, Paul Berry wrote:
> It is not explicitly stated in the GL 3.0 spec that transform feedback
> can be performed on a whole varying array (without supplying a
> subscript). However, it seems clear from context that this was the
> intent. Section 2.15 (TransformFeedback) says
It is not explicitly stated in the GL 3.0 spec that transform feedback
can be performed on a whole varying array (without supplying a
subscript). However, it seems clear from context that this was the
intent. Section 2.15 (TransformFeedback) says this:
When writing varying variables that are
