On 07/01/2015 11:00 PM, Jose Fonseca wrote:
> On 02/07/15 06:55, Matt Turner wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 3:22 PM, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
>>> The optimization logic relies on being able to read out constbuf values
>>> from program parameters. However that only works if there's no relative
>>> addr
On 02/07/15 06:55, Matt Turner wrote:
On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 3:22 PM, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
The optimization logic relies on being able to read out constbuf values
from program parameters. However that only works if there's no relative
addressing involved.
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/s
On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 3:22 PM, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> The optimization logic relies on being able to read out constbuf values
> from program parameters. However that only works if there's no relative
> addressing involved.
>
> Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91173
> Signed-of
Seems fair.
Reviewed-by: Chris Forbes
On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 10:22 AM, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> The optimization logic relies on being able to read out constbuf values
> from program parameters. However that only works if there's no relative
> addressing involved.
>
> Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedes
Ian, looks like you added this code back in antiquity...
commit 54c48a95e6e0573886433f94ac83293876ffe03d
Author: Ian Romanick
Date: Thu Feb 10 15:48:27 2011 -0800
mesa: Add partial constant propagation pass for Mesa IR
On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 6:22 PM, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> The optimization
The optimization logic relies on being able to read out constbuf values
from program parameters. However that only works if there's no relative
addressing involved.
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91173
Signed-off-by: Ilia Mirkin
---
src/mesa/program/prog_opt_constant_fold
