Reviewed-by: Jason Ekstrand
On Jul 2, 2016 2:48 AM, "Nicolai Hähnle" wrote:
> Reviewed-by: Nicolai Hähnle
>
> On 01.07.2016 19:03, Alejandro Piñeiro wrote:
>
>> For the case (both src or dst) where we had a texobject, but the
>> texobject target was not the same that the method target, this spe
Thanks for the review. And probably asking too much, would you mind to
take a look to the piglit patch that adapts the related piglit test to
the new behaviour?:
https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/piglit/2016-July/020153.html
On 02/07/16 11:48, Nicolai Hähnle wrote:
> Reviewed-by: Nicolai Häh
Reviewed-by: Nicolai Hähnle
On 01.07.2016 19:03, Alejandro Piñeiro wrote:
For the case (both src or dst) where we had a texobject, but the
texobject target was not the same that the method target, this spec
paragraph was appplied:
/* Section 18.3.2 (Copying Between Images) of the OpenGL 4.5
For the case (both src or dst) where we had a texobject, but the
texobject target was not the same that the method target, this spec
paragraph was appplied:
/* Section 18.3.2 (Copying Between Images) of the OpenGL 4.5 Core
* Profile spec says:
*
* "An INVALID_VALUE error is generated if