On 10/10/2011 01:22 PM, Chad Versace wrote:
What I would prefer to assert is that, for each region that is currently
mapped, no batch is emitted that uses that region's bo. However, it's much
easier to implement this big hammer.
Observe that this requires that the batch flush in intel_region_map
On Mon, 10 Oct 2011 13:22:46 -0700, Chad Versace wrote:
> What I would prefer to assert is that, for each region that is currently
> mapped, no batch is emitted that uses that region's bo. However, it's much
> easier to implement this big hammer.
>
> Observe that this requires that the batch flus
What I would prefer to assert is that, for each region that is currently
mapped, no batch is emitted that uses that region's bo. However, it's much
easier to implement this big hammer.
Observe that this requires that the batch flush in intel_region_map() be
moved to within the map_refcount guard.
On 10/10/2011 11:17 AM, Eric Anholt wrote:
On Thu, 6 Oct 2011 14:18:35 -0700, Chad Versace wrote:
What I would prefer to assert is that, for each region that is currently
mapped, no batch is emitted that uses that region's bo. However, it's much
easier to implement this big hammer.
diff --g
On Thu, 6 Oct 2011 14:18:35 -0700, Chad Versace wrote:
> What I would prefer to assert is that, for each region that is currently
> mapped, no batch is emitted that uses that region's bo. However, it's much
> easier to implement this big hammer.
> diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/intel/intel_re
What I would prefer to assert is that, for each region that is currently
mapped, no batch is emitted that uses that region's bo. However, it's much
easier to implement this big hammer.
CC: Eric Anholt
Signed-off-by: Chad Versace
---
src/mesa/drivers/dri/intel/intel_batchbuffer.c |5 +
s
