Quoting Kenneth Graunke (2018-09-04 16:13:59)
> On Tuesday, September 4, 2018 2:57:29 AM PDT Lionel Landwerlin wrote:
> > Both brw_bo_map_cpu() & brw_bo_map_wc() assert if mapping the
> > underlying BO fails. Failing back to brw_bo_map_gtt() doesn't seem to
> > make any sense for that reason.
> >
On Tuesday, September 4, 2018 2:57:29 AM PDT Lionel Landwerlin wrote:
> Both brw_bo_map_cpu() & brw_bo_map_wc() assert if mapping the
> underlying BO fails. Failing back to brw_bo_map_gtt() doesn't seem to
> make any sense for that reason.
>
> We also only call brw_bo_map_gtt() for tiled buffers w
Quoting Lionel Landwerlin (2018-09-04 10:57:29)
> Both brw_bo_map_cpu() & brw_bo_map_wc() assert if mapping the
> underlying BO fails. Failing back to brw_bo_map_gtt() doesn't seem to
> make any sense for that reason.
>
> We also only call brw_bo_map_gtt() for tiled buffers which as far as
> we kn
Both brw_bo_map_cpu() & brw_bo_map_wc() assert if mapping the
underlying BO fails. Failing back to brw_bo_map_gtt() doesn't seem to
make any sense for that reason.
We also only call brw_bo_map_gtt() for tiled buffers which as far as
we know are never mapped coherent (coherent is a parameter reserv
