On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 3:49 PM, Ian Romanick wrote:
> On 01/11/2013 08:54 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
>>
>> The previous solution of transcoding to ARGB gave exact results, but
>> below the expected performance. Given that the user has gone out of
>> their way to give us compressed data for perfo
Ian Romanick writes:
> On 01/11/2013 08:54 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
>> The previous solution of transcoding to ARGB gave exact results, but
>> below the expected performance. Given that the user has gone out of
>> their way to give us compressed data for performance reasons, try to
>> respect
On 01/11/2013 08:54 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
The previous solution of transcoding to ARGB gave exact results, but
below the expected performance. Given that the user has gone out of
their way to give us compressed data for performance reasons, try to
respect their wishes by doing the best comp
The previous solution of transcoding to ARGB gave exact results, but
below the expected performance. Given that the user has gone out of
their way to give us compressed data for performance reasons, try to
respect their wishes by doing the best compression we can handle. We
expect DXT1 compre
