On Friday, November 20, 2015 02:27:21 PM Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> We should probably change the bad binding table entry values in the
> binding table setup code to reflect this.
Oh, good point, we use -1...which would become 255, which means
stateless. That's probably okay, as it isn't a meaningfu
We should probably change the bad binding table entry values in the
binding table setup code to reflect this.
On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 2:23 PM, Kenneth Graunke wrote:
> The valid range for binding table indices is 0..255, so a uint8_t is a
> perfect fit. We don't need a full uint32_t.
>
> Signed-
The valid range for binding table indices is 0..255, so a uint8_t is a
perfect fit. We don't need a full uint32_t.
Signed-off-by: Kenneth Graunke
---
src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_compiler.h | 16
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dr
