On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 08:50:01AM -0700, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 11:51 PM, Pohjolainen, Topi <
> topi.pohjolai...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 12:09:01PM -0700, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> > > Sandy Bridge does not technically support mipmapped depth/stencil
On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 11:51 PM, Pohjolainen, Topi <
topi.pohjolai...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 12:09:01PM -0700, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> > Sandy Bridge does not technically support mipmapped depth/stencil. In
> > order to work around this, we allocate what are effectively comp
On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 12:09:01PM -0700, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> Sandy Bridge does not technically support mipmapped depth/stencil. In
> order to work around this, we allocate what are effectively completely
> separate images for each miplevel, ensure that they are page-aligned,
> and manually of
+chad
On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 12:09 PM, Jason Ekstrand
wrote:
> Sandy Bridge does not technically support mipmapped depth/stencil. In
> order to work around this, we allocate what are effectively completely
> separate images for each miplevel, ensure that they are page-aligned,
> and manually o
Sandy Bridge does not technically support mipmapped depth/stencil. In
order to work around this, we allocate what are effectively completely
separate images for each miplevel, ensure that they are page-aligned,
and manually offset to them. Prior to layered rendering, this was a
simple matter of s
