Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH] i965: Gut the separate OpenGL ES extension enabling.

2012-05-17 Thread Ian Romanick
On 05/15/2012 03:49 PM, Kenneth Graunke wrote: We should just set the bits of functionality that we support; the GL/ES1/ES2 flags in extensions.c will take care of advertising the appropriate extensions for the current API. This enables the GL_EXT_texture_compression_dxt1 extension on ES1/ES2 wh

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH] i965: Gut the separate OpenGL ES extension enabling.

2012-05-16 Thread Chad Versace
On 05/15/2012 03:49 PM, Kenneth Graunke wrote: > We should just set the bits of functionality that we support; the > GL/ES1/ES2 flags in extensions.c will take care of advertising the > appropriate extensions for the current API. > > This enables the GL_EXT_texture_compression_dxt1 extension on ES

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH] i965: Gut the separate OpenGL ES extension enabling.

2012-05-15 Thread Charles, Daniel
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 3:49 PM, Kenneth Graunke wrote: > We should just set the bits of functionality that we support; the > GL/ES1/ES2 flags in extensions.c will take care of advertising the > appropriate extensions for the current API. > > This enables the GL_EXT_texture_compression_dxt1 extens

[Mesa-dev] [PATCH] i965: Gut the separate OpenGL ES extension enabling.

2012-05-15 Thread Kenneth Graunke
We should just set the bits of functionality that we support; the GL/ES1/ES2 flags in extensions.c will take care of advertising the appropriate extensions for the current API. This enables the GL_EXT_texture_compression_dxt1 extension on ES1/ES2 when libtxc_dxtn is installed or the force_s3tc dri