On Wednesday, March 22, 2017 10:35:50 PM PDT Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> Is the whole spec really a flat thing you an free with a single free()? If
> not, maybe we should consider pulling in ralloc to help out.
You're right, this patch is totally bogus. ralloc sounds appropriate.
signature.asc
De
Is the whole spec really a flat thing you an free with a single free()? If
not, maybe we should consider pulling in ralloc to help out.
On March 22, 2017 22:25:40 Kenneth Graunke wrote:
We were loading the XML descriptions on every batchbuffer and leaking
them each time. Now, we load it on
We were loading the XML descriptions on every batchbuffer and leaking
them each time. Now, we load it once at screen init time and free it
at screen destroy time. Caught by Coverity.
CID: 1403203
---
src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_batchbuffer.c | 2 +-
src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_screen.c
