On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 10:16 PM, Ben Widawsky
wrote:
> AFAICT, there is no real way to make sure a send message with EOT is properly
> ignored from compact, nor can I see a way to actually encode EOT while
> compacting. Before the single send optimization we'd always bail because we
> hit
> the
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 04:58:23PM -0700, Matt Turner wrote:
> On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 10:16 PM, Ben Widawsky
> wrote:
> > AFAICT, there is no real way to make sure a send message with EOT is
> > properly
> > ignored from compact, nor can I see a way to actually encode EOT while
> > compacting. B
This patch allows us to enable our Braswell in our continuous
integration pool. Without it, gpu hangs prevent piglit from
completing.
Getting Braswell enabled in the pool will help us prevent future
regressions on the platform.
Tested-by: Mark Janes
Ben Widawsky writes:
> AFAICT, there is no
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 10:16 PM, Ben Widawsky
wrote:
> AFAICT, there is no real way to make sure a send message with EOT is properly
> ignored from compact, nor can I see a way to actually encode EOT while
> compacting. Before the single send optimization we'd always bail because we
> hit
> the
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 11:31:40AM +0100, Neil Roberts wrote:
> Ben Widawsky writes:
>
> > AFAICT, there is no real way to make sure a send message with EOT is
> > properly ignored from compact, nor can I see a way to actually encode
> > EOT while compacting. Before the single send optimization w
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 07:00:38AM -0700, Matt Turner wrote:
> On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 3:31 AM, Neil Roberts wrote:
> > Ben Widawsky writes:
> >
> >> AFAICT, there is no real way to make sure a send message with EOT is
> >> properly ignored from compact, nor can I see a way to actually encode
> >
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 3:31 AM, Neil Roberts wrote:
> Ben Widawsky writes:
>
>> AFAICT, there is no real way to make sure a send message with EOT is
>> properly ignored from compact, nor can I see a way to actually encode
>> EOT while compacting. Before the single send optimization we'd always
>
Ben Widawsky writes:
> AFAICT, there is no real way to make sure a send message with EOT is
> properly ignored from compact, nor can I see a way to actually encode
> EOT while compacting. Before the single send optimization we'd always
> bail because we hit the is_immediate && !is_compactable_imm
I forgot to mention that the predecessor to this patch fixed around 70 BSW
failures on Jenkins. Note that our current Jenkins baseline for BSW is probably
not fully baked atm.
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 10:16:04PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> AFAICT, there is no real way to make sure a send message w
AFAICT, there is no real way to make sure a send message with EOT is properly
ignored from compact, nor can I see a way to actually encode EOT while
compacting. Before the single send optimization we'd always bail because we hit
the is_immediate && !is_compactable_immediate case. However, with sing
10 matches
Mail list logo
