On 04/25/2013 01:12 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
It appears that Z16 on Intel hardware is in fact slower than Z24, so
people are getting surprisingly hurt when trying to use Z16 as a
performance-versus-precision tradeoff, or when they're targeting GLES2 and
that's all you get.
GL 3.0+ have Z16 on the
It appears that Z16 on Intel hardware is in fact slower than Z24, so
people are getting surprisingly hurt when trying to use Z16 as a
performance-versus-precision tradeoff, or when they're targeting GLES2 and
that's all you get.
GL 3.0+ have Z16 on the list of required exact format sizes, but GLES