On Oct 29, 2015 5:51 PM, "Matt Turner" wrote:
>
> We've made a mistake in calling the Channel Enable bits "writemask",
> because they do more than control which channels of the destination are
> written -- they actually control which channels are enabled (surprise!
> surprise!)
>
> So, if we emit
We've made a mistake in calling the Channel Enable bits "writemask",
because they do more than control which channels of the destination are
written -- they actually control which channels are enabled (surprise!
surprise!)
So, if we emit
cmp.z.f0(8) null.xy<1>D g10<4,4,1>.xyzzD g2
