On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 10:05 AM, Mark Janes wrote:
> Tested-by: Mark Janes
>
> Ben Widawsky writes:
>
>> The original code meant to do this, but was only checking num_samples == 1 to
>> figure out if a surface was fast clear capable. However, we can allocate
>> single
>> sample miptrees with n
Tested-by: Mark Janes
Ben Widawsky writes:
> The original code meant to do this, but was only checking num_samples == 1 to
> figure out if a surface was fast clear capable. However, we can allocate
> single
> sample miptrees with num_samples == 0 (when it's an internally created
> buffer).
>
The original code meant to do this, but was only checking num_samples == 1 to
figure out if a surface was fast clear capable. However, we can allocate single
sample miptrees with num_samples == 0 (when it's an internally created buffer).
This fixes a bunch of the piglit tests on gen8. Other gens s
