El 12/07/18 a las 03:23, Caio Marcelo de Oliveira Filho escribió:
> On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 06:03:05PM +0200, Jose Maria Casanova Crespo wrote:
>> At 232ed8980217dd65ab0925df28156f565b94b2e5 "i965/fs: Register allocator
>> shoudn't use grf127 for sends dest" we didn't take into account the case
>>
On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 06:03:05PM +0200, Jose Maria Casanova Crespo wrote:
> At 232ed8980217dd65ab0925df28156f565b94b2e5 "i965/fs: Register allocator
> shoudn't use grf127 for sends dest" we didn't take into account the case
> of SEND instructions that are not send_from_grf. But since Gen7+ althou
At 232ed8980217dd65ab0925df28156f565b94b2e5 "i965/fs: Register allocator
shoudn't use grf127 for sends dest" we didn't take into account the case
of SEND instructions that are not send_from_grf. But since Gen7+ although
the backend still uses MRFs internally for sends they are finally asigned
to a