"Armin K." writes:
> On 13.11.2013 1:08, Eric Anholt wrote:
>> After more testing (everyone else trying to build the stack is having as
>> much trouble as I had, even after the problems I had were fixed), it
>> really feels like dri3 is not something we're ready to support in this
>> stable branc
On 13.11.2013 1:08, Eric Anholt wrote:
After more testing (everyone else trying to build the stack is having as
much trouble as I had, even after the problems I had were fixed), it
really feels like dri3 is not something we're ready to support in this
stable branch. The .c/.h code will remain he
On 11/12/2013 05:08 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
After more testing (everyone else trying to build the stack is having as
much trouble as I had, even after the problems I had were fixed), it
really feels like dri3 is not something we're ready to support in this
stable branch. The .c/.h code will remai
On 11/12/2013 04:08 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
> After more testing (everyone else trying to build the stack is having as
> much trouble as I had, even after the problems I had were fixed), it
> really feels like dri3 is not something we're ready to support in this
> stable branch. The .c/.h code will
After more testing (everyone else trying to build the stack is having as
much trouble as I had, even after the problems I had were fixed), it
really feels like dri3 is not something we're ready to support in this
stable branch. The .c/.h code will remain here to enable easier
cherry-picking from m
