On Fri, 2015-07-10 at 19:07 +1200, Chris Forbes wrote:
> Perf data?
When the new hash table implementation was added to Mesa by Eric it
claimed to be much faster, see commits 35fd61bd99c1 and 72e55bb6888ff.
The set implementation seems to follow the same implementation strategy,
so I suppose it m
On Fri, 2015-07-10 at 19:07 +1200, Chris Forbes wrote:
> Perf data?
I can create some if you like, but wasn't program/hash_table.c meant to die
along time ago [1] anyway.
[1] http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/mesa-dev/2013-December/050524.html
>
> On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 6:41 PM, Timothy Ar
Perf data?
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 6:41 PM, Timothy Arceri wrote:
> This implementation should be faster and there was no
> need to store a data field.
> ---
> src/glsl/ir_validate.cpp | 24
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/glsl/ir
This implementation should be faster and there was no
need to store a data field.
---
src/glsl/ir_validate.cpp | 24
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/glsl/ir_validate.cpp b/src/glsl/ir_validate.cpp
index cfe0df3..684bef2 100644
--- a/src/
