On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 2:12 PM, Ian Romanick wrote:
> On 11/28/2012 11:21 AM, Matt Turner wrote:
>>
>> The GLSL ES 3.0 spec (Section 12.17) says:
>> "GLSL ES 1.00 removed token pasting and other functionality."
>
>
> Do we have piglit tests? 'make check' tests?
No, I'll do so.
> I assume this
Matt Turner writes:
> "##" {
> + if (parser->is_gles)
> + glcpp_error(yylloc, yyextra, "Token pasting (##) is illegal in
> GLES");
> return PASTE;
I'm glad that is_gles flag is proving useful. Thanks for doing this one.
Reviewed-by: Carl Worth
-Carl
--
carl.d.wo...@in
On 11/28/2012 11:21 AM, Matt Turner wrote:
The GLSL ES 3.0 spec (Section 12.17) says:
"GLSL ES 1.00 removed token pasting and other functionality."
Do we have piglit tests? 'make check' tests? I assume this passes the
GLES3 conformance test without regressing anything.
This should be marke
The GLSL ES 3.0 spec (Section 12.17) says:
"GLSL ES 1.00 removed token pasting and other functionality."
---
src/glsl/glcpp/glcpp-lex.l |2 ++
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/glsl/glcpp/glcpp-lex.l b/src/glsl/glcpp/glcpp-lex.l
index fd28711..a029f62 100644
--