On Thu, 2014-05-22 at 09:54 -0400, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 2:56 AM, Timothy Arceri wrote:
> > On Wed, 2014-05-21 at 18:05 -0400, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 6:02 PM, Timothy Arceri
> > wrote:
> >> Unless we run out of memory the old if statement would a
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 2:56 AM, Timothy Arceri wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-05-21 at 18:05 -0400, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 6:02 PM, Timothy Arceri
> wrote:
>> Unless we run out of memory the old if statement would always fail so
>> reflect the more likely outcome. Should be be fas
On Wed, 2014-05-21 at 18:05 -0400, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 6:02 PM, Timothy Arceri wrote:
> > Unless we run out of memory the old if statement would always fail so
> > reflect the more likely outcome. Should be be faster most of the time and
> > slightly cleaner looking cod
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 6:02 PM, Timothy Arceri wrote:
> Unless we run out of memory the old if statement would always fail so reflect
> the more likely outcome. Should be be faster most of the time and slightly
> cleaner looking code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Timothy Arceri
> ---
> src/gallium/auxi
Unless we run out of memory the old if statement would always fail so reflect
the more likely outcome. Should be be faster most of the time and slightly
cleaner looking code.
Signed-off-by: Timothy Arceri
---
src/gallium/auxiliary/util/u_upload_mgr.c | 7 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+
