Am 03.07.2014 03:19, schrieb Ilia Mirkin:
> On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 4:03 PM, Roland Scheidegger wrote:
>> Actually on second thought, because centroid and sample are mutually
>> exclusive (or more generally, the "Interpolate" member determines "how"
>> interpolation is done, whereas these two deter
On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 4:03 PM, Roland Scheidegger wrote:
> Actually on second thought, because centroid and sample are mutually
> exclusive (or more generally, the "Interpolate" member determines "how"
> interpolation is done, whereas these two determine the "where")
> something like this might b
Actually on second thought, because centroid and sample are mutually
exclusive (or more generally, the "Interpolate" member determines "how"
interpolation is done, whereas these two determine the "where")
something like this might be better:
struct tgsi_declaration_interp
{
unsigned Interpolate
I don't have much of an idea how the interaction with per sample shading
should look like, but this looks alright to me.
Roland
Am 02.07.2014 03:55, schrieb Ilia Mirkin:
> Signed-off-by: Ilia Mirkin
> ---
>
> Not sure if this is the right approach or if I should combine it with Centroid
> more
Signed-off-by: Ilia Mirkin
---
Not sure if this is the right approach or if I should combine it with Centroid
more directly. More modifications will be required wrt per-sample shading
since we'll need to distinguish the min samples case where everything is
per-sample-interpolated vs this case whe
