On 30 December 2014 at 08:14, Roland Scheidegger wrote:
> Just minor nits, looks good to me otherwise.
> I agree with others that probably the round family of functions should
> be added too (but could be done in another patch). Maybe could have one
> cap bit then (so some implementations only doi
Just minor nits, looks good to me otherwise.
I agree with others that probably the round family of functions should
be added too (but could be done in another patch). Maybe could have one
cap bit then (so some implementations only doing what's required by sm5,
hence missing things like round and rs
On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 10:42 PM, Dave Airlie wrote:
>>> +#define TGSI_OPCODE_DRCP208 /* eg, cayman */
>>> +#define TGSI_OPCODE_DSQRT 209 /* eg, cayman also has DRSQ
>>> */
>>
>>
>> Adding DRSQ seems like a good idea, at least for graphics with floats its
>> more freq
>> + // fprintf(stderr, "%f %f\n", src[0].d[0], src[1].d[0]);
>
>
> leftover debug print
dropped,
>> enum tgsi_exec_datatype {
>> TGSI_EXEC_DATA_FLOAT,
>> TGSI_EXEC_DATA_INT,
>> - TGSI_EXEC_DATA_UINT
>> + TGSI_EXEC_DATA_UINT,
>> + TGSI_EXEC_DATA_DOUBLE,
>
>
> One comma too many
f
On Tue, 23 Dec 2014 22:50:30 +0100, Dave Airlie wrote:
This patch adds support for a set of double opcodes
to TGSI. It is an update of work done originally
by Michal Krol on the gallium-double-opcodes branch.
The opcodes have a hint where they came from in the
header file.
v2: add unsigned/in
This patch adds support for a set of double opcodes
to TGSI. It is an update of work done originally
by Michal Krol on the gallium-double-opcodes branch.
The opcodes have a hint where they came from in the
header file.
v2: add unsigned/int <-> double
v2.1: update docs.
This is based on code by M
