On 30/09/16 03:55 AM, Marek Olšák wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 8:37 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 10:56 PM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>>> On 28/09/16 12:33 AM, Rob Clark wrote:
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark
---
I had a scan through the rest of pipe_resource allocations
On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 8:37 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 10:56 PM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>> On 28/09/16 12:33 AM, Rob Clark wrote:
>>> Signed-off-by: Rob Clark
>>> ---
>>> I had a scan through the rest of pipe_resource allocations, and I think
>>> this is the only remaining one
On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 10:56 PM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On 28/09/16 12:33 AM, Rob Clark wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Rob Clark
>> ---
>> I had a scan through the rest of pipe_resource allocations, and I think
>> this is the only remaining one (besides r600_alloc_buffer_struct())
>> which was using M
On 28/09/16 12:33 AM, Rob Clark wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Rob Clark
> ---
> I had a scan through the rest of pipe_resource allocations, and I think
> this is the only remaining one (besides r600_alloc_buffer_struct())
> which was using MALLOC_STRUCT().. sorry 'bout that
Note that the MALLOC_STRUCT
Reviewed-by: Marek Olšák
Marek
On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 5:33 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Rob Clark
> ---
> I had a scan through the rest of pipe_resource allocations, and I think
> this is the only remaining one (besides r600_alloc_buffer_struct())
> which was using MALLOC_STRUCT()..
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark
---
I had a scan through the rest of pipe_resource allocations, and I think
this is the only remaining one (besides r600_alloc_buffer_struct())
which was using MALLOC_STRUCT().. sorry 'bout that
src/gallium/drivers/r300/r300_screen_buffer.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 inse
