On 27 September 2016 at 16:18, Eric Engestrom wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 04:10:53PM +0200, Nicolai Hähnle wrote:
>> On 27.09.2016 14:40, Emil Velikov wrote:
>> > From: Emil Velikov
>> >
>> > Otherwise one can overflow the signed variable and (attempt to) cause
>> > all sorts of strange beha
On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 04:10:53PM +0200, Nicolai Hähnle wrote:
> On 27.09.2016 14:40, Emil Velikov wrote:
> > From: Emil Velikov
> >
> > Otherwise one can overflow the signed variable and (attempt to) cause
> > all sorts of strange behaviour.
>
> As long as we're worrying about such things, sho
On 27.09.2016 14:40, Emil Velikov wrote:
From: Emil Velikov
Otherwise one can overflow the signed variable and (attempt to) cause
all sorts of strange behaviour.
As long as we're worrying about such things, shouldn't it really be a
size_t then? With that,
Reviewed-by: Nicolai Hähnle
Chee
From: Emil Velikov
Otherwise one can overflow the signed variable and (attempt to) cause
all sorts of strange behaviour.
Signed-off-by: Emil Velikov
---
src/egl/drivers/dri2/egl_dri2.c | 2 +-
src/egl/main/eglconfig.c| 3 ++-
src/egl/main/eglcontext.c | 3 ++-
src/egl/main/egldis