Emil Velikov, le Mon 02 Feb 2015 18:24:29 +, a écrit :
> Did you had the change to try the patch - does it cause issues on your
> setup (build and/or runtime-wise) ?
My setup has neither HAVE_LIBDRM nor HAVE_DRM_PLATFORM so it can't break
it :)
Samuel
_
On 22/01/15 20:53, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Emil Velikov, le Thu 22 Jan 2015 16:52:06 +, a écrit :
>> On 14/01/15 19:36, Axel Davy wrote:
>>> To fix build when libdrm is not found,
>>> commit a594cec7e3ef275c386054127a357110a19dd823 did put several
>>> parts of egl code under #ifdef HAVE_DRM_PL
Emil Velikov, le Thu 22 Jan 2015 16:52:06 +, a écrit :
> On 14/01/15 19:36, Axel Davy wrote:
> > To fix build when libdrm is not found,
> > commit a594cec7e3ef275c386054127a357110a19dd823 did put several
> > parts of egl code under #ifdef HAVE_DRM_PLATFORM.
> >
> > HAVE_DRM_PLATFORM means the
On 14/01/15 19:36, Axel Davy wrote:
> To fix build when libdrm is not found,
> commit a594cec7e3ef275c386054127a357110a19dd823 did put several
> parts of egl code under #ifdef HAVE_DRM_PLATFORM.
>
> HAVE_DRM_PLATFORM means the egl drm platform is being built.
> What should have been used instead i
To fix build when libdrm is not found,
commit a594cec7e3ef275c386054127a357110a19dd823 did put several
parts of egl code under #ifdef HAVE_DRM_PLATFORM.
HAVE_DRM_PLATFORM means the egl drm platform is being built.
What should have been used instead is HAVE_LIBDRM.
At a few locations, the HAVE_DRM
