On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 10:19 PM, Bas Nieuwenhuizen
wrote:
> On GFX9 whether the buffer size is interpreted as elements or bytes
> depends on whether IDXEN is enabled in the instruction. If the index
> is a constant zero, LLVM optimizes IDXEN to 0.
>
> Now the size in elements is interpreted in byt
On GFX9 whether the buffer size is interpreted as elements or bytes
depends on whether IDXEN is enabled in the instruction. If the index
is a constant zero, LLVM optimizes IDXEN to 0.
Now the size in elements is interpreted in bytes which of course
results in out of bounds accesses.
The correct f
On 03/09/2018 12:38 AM, Bas Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
On GFX9 whether the buffer size is interpreted as elements or bytes
depends on whether IDXEN is enabled in the instruction. If the index
is a constant zero, LLVM optimizes IDXEN to 0.
Now the size in elements is interpreted in bytes which of cou
On GFX9 whether the buffer size is interpreted as elements or bytes
depends on whether IDXEN is enabled in the instruction. If the index
is a constant zero, LLVM optimizes IDXEN to 0.
Now the size in elements is interpreted in bytes which of course
results in out of bounds accesses.
The correct f
On GFX9 whether the buffer size is interpreted as elements or bytes
depends on whether IDXEN is enabled in the instruction. If the index
is a constant zero, LLVM optimizes IDXEN to 0.
Now the size in elements is interpreted in bytes which of course
results in out of bounds accesses.
The correct f
