Yeah, I think this is fine. We could expand the assert further to cover
all possible casting cases but it's probably not worth it.
Reviewed-by: Jason Ekstrand
--Jason
On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 4:14 AM Juan A. Suarez Romero
wrote:
> On Tue, 2018-11-20 at 09:47 +0100, Iago Toral Quiroga wrote:
>
"Juan A. Suarez Romero" writes:
> On Tue, 2018-11-20 at 11:13 +0100, Juan A. Suarez Romero wrote:
>> On Tue, 2018-11-20 at 09:47 +0100, Iago Toral Quiroga wrote:
>> > This reverts commit .
>> >
>> > For this to work the compiler must ensure that it never puts
>> > the values that arrive to this
On Tue, 2018-11-20 at 11:13 +0100, Juan A. Suarez Romero wrote:
> On Tue, 2018-11-20 at 09:47 +0100, Iago Toral Quiroga wrote:
> > This reverts commit .
> >
> > For this to work the compiler must ensure that it never puts
> > the values that arrive to this helper into unsigned variables
> > at any
On Tue, 2018-11-20 at 09:47 +0100, Iago Toral Quiroga wrote:
> This reverts commit .
>
> For this to work the compiler must ensure that it never puts
> the values that arrive to this helper into unsigned variables
> at any point in its processing, since that would not apply sign
> extension to the
This reverts commit 1f29f4db1e867357a119c0c7c34fb54dc27fb682.
For this to work the compiler must ensure that it never puts
the values that arrive to this helper into unsigned variables
at any point in its processing, since that would not apply sign
extension to the value and it would break the exp
