Thankyou for pushing; I will post the one liner for the release notes
shortly.
Best Regards,
-Kevin Rogovin
On Fri, 24 Aug 2018 at 3.44, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> Your first version has already landed; Ken pushed it:
>
>
> https://cgit.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/commit/src?id=7ec308d978019dd9aa0e7
Your first version has already landed; Ken pushed it:
https://cgit.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/commit/src?id=7ec308d978019dd9aa0e7a756b5919e34431196d
Mind making a patch with just the release notes update?
Thanks!
--Jason
On August 22, 2018 22:57:42 Kevin Rogovin wrote:
Hi,
My request for an
Hi,
My request for an account was NAK'd by the i965 maintainer. As such, I
will post a v2 with the update to release notes requested and I hope
Plamena can push that for me.
Best Regards,
-Kevin Rogovin
On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 12:39 PM Emil Velikov
wrote:
> Hi Kevin,
>
> On 20 August 2018 at
Hi Kevin,
On 20 August 2018 at 15:11, Kevin Rogovin wrote:
> Hi Plamena,
>
> Thankyou for the fast review. Can you push it or have someone push it? (I
> do not have push rights)
>
You have contributed a number of good patches in Mesa, always
listening to feedback.
I would welcome if you're given
Sure thing!
-Pam
On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 3:25 PM, Kevin Rogovin
wrote:
> Hi Plamena,
>
> Thankyou for the fast review. Can you push it or have someone push it? (I
> do not have push rights)
>
> -Keviv
>
> On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 2:50 PM, Manolova, Plamena <
> plamena.manol...@intel.com> wrote:
Hi Plamena,
Thankyou for the fast review. Can you push it or have someone push it? (I
do not have push rights)
-Keviv
On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 2:50 PM, Manolova, Plamena <
plamena.manol...@intel.com> wrote:
> Hi Kevin,
> This looks good to me :)
>
> Reviewed-by: Plamena Manolova
>
> On Wed, Au
Hi Plamena,
Thankyou for the fast review. Can you push it or have someone push it? (I
do not have push rights)
-Keviv
On Mon, Aug 20, 2018, 2:50 PM Manolova, Plamena
wrote:
> Hi Kevin,
> This looks good to me :)
>
> Reviewed-by: Plamena Manolova
>
> On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 2:29 PM, wrote:
>
Hi Kevin,
This looks good to me :)
Reviewed-by: Plamena Manolova
On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 2:29 PM, wrote:
> From: Kevin Rogovin
>
> The main purpose for having NV_fragment_shader_interlock
> extension is because that extension is also for GLES31 while
> the ARB extension is for GL only.
> ---
From: Kevin Rogovin
The main purpose for having NV_fragment_shader_interlock
extension is because that extension is also for GLES31 while
the ARB extension is for GL only.
---
src/compiler/glsl/builtin_functions.cpp | 18 ++
src/compiler/glsl/glsl_parser.yy | 6 --
