On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 02:24:42PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 12:03:54PM -0700, Matt Turner wrote:
> > I don't think putting Intel-internal links in the commit message is a good
> > idea.
> >
> > Ken's made similar comments to me.
> >
> > Also, so much off the wall comm
On Thursday, July 09, 2015 11:00:40 AM Ben Widawsky wrote:
> While implementing the workaround in the previous patch I noticed things were
> starting to get a bit messy. Since gen8 works differently enough from gen7, I
> thought splitting it out with be good.
IMHO this is still a bit messy. What
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 12:03:54PM -0700, Matt Turner wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 11:00 AM, Ben Widawsky
> wrote:
> > While implementing the workaround in the previous patch I noticed things
> > were
> > starting to get a bit messy. Since gen8 works differently enough from gen7,
> > I
> > th
On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 11:00 AM, Ben Widawsky
wrote:
> While implementing the workaround in the previous patch I noticed things were
> starting to get a bit messy. Since gen8 works differently enough from gen7, I
> thought splitting it out with be good.
>
> While here, get rid of gen8 MOCS which d
While implementing the workaround in the previous patch I noticed things were
starting to get a bit messy. Since gen8 works differently enough from gen7, I
thought splitting it out with be good.
While here, get rid of gen8 MOCS which does nothing and was in the wrong place
anyway.
This patch is t
