On 02/17/2015 02:12 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 1:59 PM, Connor Abbott wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 4:41 PM, Alan Coopersmith
>> wrote:
>>> On 02/17/15 10:21 AM, Emil Velikov wrote:
Hi Alan,
On 16/02/15 02:41, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
>
> When
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 1:59 PM, Connor Abbott wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 4:41 PM, Alan Coopersmith
> wrote:
>> On 02/17/15 10:21 AM, Emil Velikov wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Alan,
>>>
>>> On 16/02/15 02:41, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
When compiling in C99 or C++11 modes, Solaris defines isnor
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 4:41 PM, Alan Coopersmith
wrote:
> On 02/17/15 10:21 AM, Emil Velikov wrote:
>>
>> Hi Alan,
>>
>> On 16/02/15 02:41, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
>>>
>>> When compiling in C99 or C++11 modes, Solaris defines isnormal() as
>>> a macro via , which causes the function definition to
On 02/17/15 10:21 AM, Emil Velikov wrote:
Hi Alan,
On 16/02/15 02:41, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
When compiling in C99 or C++11 modes, Solaris defines isnormal() as
a macro via , which causes the function definition to become
too mangled to compile.
Is this series sufficient to get mesa working
Hi Alan,
On 16/02/15 02:41, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
> When compiling in C99 or C++11 modes, Solaris defines isnormal() as
> a macro via , which causes the function definition to become
> too mangled to compile.
>
Is this series sufficient to get mesa working again with Solaris ?
Afaics there is a
When compiling in C99 or C++11 modes, Solaris defines isnormal() as
a macro via , which causes the function definition to become
too mangled to compile.
Signed-off-by: Alan Coopersmith
---
src/glsl/ir_constant_expression.cpp |2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/
