https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111272
Michel Dänzer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111272
--- Comment #15 from Parker Reed ---
Ahh thanks. Wasn't aware of that. This can be closed out in that case. I'll bug
the software I was using about not setting the DRI_PRIME in certain cases.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111272
--- Comment #14 from Michel Dänzer ---
(In reply to Parker Reed from comment #13)
> But the Intel card isn't enabled in the conf.
That doesn't matter with DRI3. With it, libGL can use an alternative GPU
without any explicit support for it in Xo
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111272
--- Comment #13 from Parker Reed ---
But the Intel card isn't enabled in the conf. Why is it trying to init it if
it's not there? i915 is loaded kernel side but it's just dead displaying a TTY.
I agree the DRI_PRIME shouldn't be called in this
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111272
--- Comment #12 from Michel Dänzer ---
In other words, the only thing preventing the Intel GPU from being used in this
case is the i965 driver missing the blitImage functionality.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee fo
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111272
--- Comment #11 from Michel Dänzer ---
(In reply to Parker Reed from comment #10)
> So would DRI_PRIME=1 acting like 0 if only one GPU is present, be a
> possibility? The fact it's trying to load the non-existent GPU
It's not really "non-existe
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111272
--- Comment #10 from Parker Reed ---
So would DRI_PRIME=1 acting like 0 if only one GPU is present, be a
possibility? The fact it's trying to load the non-existent GPU in the first
place seems to be the root issue.
--
You are receiving this ma
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111272
--- Comment #9 from Parker Reed ---
I need to wakeup and read the comment. So it's because DRI2. Thanks for the
reply.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are the QA Contact for the bug.___
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111272
--- Comment #8 from Parker Reed ---
Aye, I was more intrigued by the vsync bypass. It even uncapped games with a
forced 60 (regardless of vsync being on or off)
Just a consequence of that DRI fallback?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111272
Michel Dänzer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|dri-devel@lists.freedesktop |mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.
10 matches
Mail list logo
