Re: [Mesa-dev] [BRANCH] Gallium Radeon cleanups

2016-06-24 Thread Nicolai Hähnle
I noticed a small number of places where true/false are assigned to booleans that are still in the Gallium interfaces: - uses of DEBUG_GET_ONCE_BOOL_OPTION - timestamp_disjoint.disjoint ... but then if those weren't changed now, it'd just cause inconsistencies later when the Gallium interface

Re: [Mesa-dev] [BRANCH] Gallium Radeon cleanups

2016-06-22 Thread Marek Olšák
On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 12:16 AM, Vedran Miletić wrote: > On 06/22/2016 08:49 PM, Marek Olšák wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> The top 6 patches in this branch are cleanups I'd like to push. I'm >> not sending them to the list because they are kinda boring. (and there >> is another series with 6 patches alr

Re: [Mesa-dev] [BRANCH] Gallium Radeon cleanups

2016-06-22 Thread Vedran Miletić
On 06/22/2016 08:49 PM, Marek Olšák wrote: Hi, The top 6 patches in this branch are cleanups I'd like to push. I'm not sending them to the list because they are kinda boring. (and there is another series with 6 patches already) https://cgit.freedesktop.org/~mareko/mesa/log/?h=radeon-cleanups C

Re: [Mesa-dev] [BRANCH] Gallium Radeon cleanups

2016-06-22 Thread Alex Deucher
On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 2:49 PM, Marek Olšák wrote: > Hi, > > The top 6 patches in this branch are cleanups I'd like to push. I'm > not sending them to the list because they are kinda boring. (and there > is another series with 6 patches already) > > https://cgit.freedesktop.org/~mareko/mesa/log/?

[Mesa-dev] [BRANCH] Gallium Radeon cleanups

2016-06-22 Thread Marek Olšák
Hi, The top 6 patches in this branch are cleanups I'd like to push. I'm not sending them to the list because they are kinda boring. (and there is another series with 6 patches already) https://cgit.freedesktop.org/~mareko/mesa/log/?h=radeon-cleanups Commits: gallium/radeon: use r600_resour