line
discussion.
v4:
- Various improvements all over. (Tvrtko)
You can ignore my previous reply, the clarifications from v4 read good
to me.
Acked-by: Tvrtko Ursulin
Regards,
Tvrtko
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld
Cc: Thomas Hellström
Cc: Lionel Landwerlin
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin
Cc: Jon Bloomf
On 17/05/2022 10:12, Matthew Auld wrote:
On 17/05/2022 09:29, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
On 16/05/2022 19:11, Matthew Auld wrote:
Add an entry for the new uapi needed for small BAR on DG2+.
v2:
- Some spelling fixes and other small tweaks. (Akeem & Thomas)
- Rework error cap
On 17/05/2022 10:39, Lionel Landwerlin wrote:
On 17/05/2022 12:23, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
On 17/05/2022 09:55, Lionel Landwerlin wrote:
On 17/05/2022 11:29, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
On 16/05/2022 19:11, Matthew Auld wrote:
Add an entry for the new uapi needed for small BAR on DG2+.
v2
On 17/05/2022 09:55, Lionel Landwerlin wrote:
On 17/05/2022 11:29, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
On 16/05/2022 19:11, Matthew Auld wrote:
Add an entry for the new uapi needed for small BAR on DG2+.
v2:
- Some spelling fixes and other small tweaks. (Akeem & Thomas)
- Rework error cap
line
discussion.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld
Cc: Thomas Hellström
Cc: Lionel Landwerlin
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin
Cc: Jon Bloomfield
Cc: Daniel Vetter
Cc: Jon Bloomfield
Cc: Jordan Justen
Cc: Kenneth Graunke
Cc: Akeem G Abodunrin
Cc: mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
---
Documentation/gpu
On 03/05/2022 11:22, Matthew Auld wrote:
On 02/05/2022 09:53, Lionel Landwerlin wrote:
On 02/05/2022 10:54, Lionel Landwerlin wrote:
On 20/04/2022 20:13, Matthew Auld wrote:
Add an entry for the new uapi needed for small BAR on DG2+.
v2:
- Some spelling fixes and other small tweaks. (Ake
On 28/04/2022 11:25, Matthew Auld wrote:
On 28/04/2022 09:55, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
On 27/04/2022 18:36, Matthew Auld wrote:
On 27/04/2022 09:36, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
On 20/04/2022 18:13, Matthew Auld wrote:
Add an entry for the new uapi needed for small BAR on DG2+.
v2:
- Some
On 27/04/2022 18:36, Matthew Auld wrote:
On 27/04/2022 09:36, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
On 20/04/2022 18:13, Matthew Auld wrote:
Add an entry for the new uapi needed for small BAR on DG2+.
v2:
- Some spelling fixes and other small tweaks. (Akeem & Thomas)
- Rework error cap
On 20/04/2022 18:13, Matthew Auld wrote:
Add an entry for the new uapi needed for small BAR on DG2+.
v2:
- Some spelling fixes and other small tweaks. (Akeem & Thomas)
- Rework error capture interactions, including no longer needing
NEEDS_CPU_ACCESS for objects marked for capture. (
:
(Marcin Ślusarz):
- Lot's of typos / bad english fixed
(Tvrtko Ursulin):
- Consistent pseudo code, clean up wording in descriptions
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin
Cc: Tony Ye
CC: Carl Zhang
Cc: Daniel Vetter
Cc: Jason Ekstrand
Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost
---
Documentation/gp
On 27/05/2021 00:33, Matthew Brost wrote:
Add entry for i915 GuC submission / DRM scheduler integration plan.
Follow up patch with details of new parallel submission uAPI to come.
v2:
(Daniel Vetter)
- Expand explaination of why bonding isn't supported for GuC
submission
- CC some
On 21/05/2021 17:48, Matthew Brost wrote:
On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 01:00:54PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
[snip]
+ * enables parallel submission across multiple engine classes. In this case
each
+ * context's logical engine mask indicates where that context can placed. It is
+ * im
On 20/05/2021 20:41, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 11:57:44AM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
On 20/05/2021 10:54, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 7:19 PM Matthew Brost wrote:
On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 01:10:04PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Tue, May 18, 2021 at
: Tvrtko Ursulin
Cc: Tony Ye
CC: Carl Zhang
Cc: Daniel Vetter
Cc: Jason Ekstrand
Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost
---
Documentation/gpu/rfc/i915_parallel_execbuf.h | 144 ++
Documentation/gpu/rfc/i915_scheduler.rst | 53 ++-
2 files changed, 196 insertions(+), 1 deletion
Vetter):
- Expand logical order explaination
- Add dummy header
- Only allow N BBs in execbuf IOCTL
- Configure parallel submission per slot not per gem context
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin
Cc: Tony Ye
CC: Carl Zhang
Cc: Daniel Vetter
Cc: Jason Ekstrand
Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost
- Configure parallel submission per slot not per gem context
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin
Cc: Tony Ye
CC: Carl Zhang
Cc: Daniel Vetter
Cc: Jason Ekstrand
Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost
---
Documentation/gpu/rfc/i915_parallel_execbuf.h | 144 ++
Documentation/gpu/rfc/i915_scheduler.rst
On 21/04/2021 18:17, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 9:25 AM Tvrtko Ursulin
wrote:
On 21/04/2021 14:54, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 3:22 AM Tvrtko Ursulin
wrote:
On 20/04/2021 18:00, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 11:34 AM Tvrtko Ursulin
On 21/04/2021 14:54, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 3:22 AM Tvrtko Ursulin
wrote:
On 20/04/2021 18:00, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 11:34 AM Tvrtko Ursulin
wrote:
On 19/04/2021 16:19, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 7:02 AM Matthew Auld
On 20/04/2021 18:00, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 11:34 AM Tvrtko Ursulin
wrote:
On 19/04/2021 16:19, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 7:02 AM Matthew Auld wrote:
On 16/04/2021 17:38, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 11:04 AM Matthew Auld
On 19/04/2021 16:19, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 7:02 AM Matthew Auld wrote:
On 16/04/2021 17:38, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 11:04 AM Matthew Auld wrote:
Add an entry for the new uAPI needed for DG1.
v2(Daniel):
- include the overall upstreaming
On 15/04/2021 16:59, Matthew Auld wrote:
Add a note about the two-step process.
Suggested-by: Daniel Vetter
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen
Cc: Jordan Justen
Cc: Daniel Vetter
Cc: Kenneth Graunke
Cc: Jason Ekstrand
Cc: Dave Airlie
Cc: dri-de...@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc:
On 25/05/2017 15:14, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 12:28:07PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
On 18/05/2017 18:00, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 05:20:38PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
On 18/05/2017 14:37, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 02:06:35PM
On 18/05/2017 18:00, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 05:20:38PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
On 18/05/2017 14:37, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 02:06:35PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
But this problem in general can also be solved separately from
class-instance
From: Tvrtko Ursulin
Building on top of the previous patch which exported the concept
of engine classes and instances, we can also use this instead of
the current awkward engine selection uAPI.
This is primarily interesting for the VCS engine selection which
is a) currently done via disjoint
From: Tvrtko Ursulin
Engine discovery uAPI allows userspace to probe for engine
configuration and features without needing to maintain the
internal PCI id based database.
This enables removal of code duplications across userspace
components.
Probing is done via the new
On 18/05/2017 14:37, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 02:06:35PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
On 18/05/2017 13:24, Chris Wilson wrote:
Yes, I would argue to defer it until later. One problem I have at the
moment is that not all members of a class are equal, HEVC-capable
engines
On 18/05/2017 15:10, Emil Velikov wrote:
Hi Tvrtko,
On 18 May 2017 at 14:06, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
struct drm_i915_engine_info {
/** Engine instance number. */
__u32 instance;
__u32 rsvd;
/** Engine specific features and info. */
#define
On 17/05/2017 17:44, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 04:40:57PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
From: Tvrtko Ursulin
Building on top of the previous patch which exported the concept
of engine classes and instances, we can also use this instead of
the current awkward engine selection
On 18/05/2017 13:24, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 01:13:20PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
On 18/05/2017 12:10, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 01:55:59PM +0300, Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
On ke, 2017-05-17 at 16:40 +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
From: Tvrtko Ursulin
On 18/05/2017 12:10, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 01:55:59PM +0300, Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
On ke, 2017-05-17 at 16:40 +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
From: Tvrtko Ursulin
Building on top of the previous patch which exported the concept
of engine classes and instances, we can
From: Tvrtko Ursulin
Building on top of the previous patch which exported the concept
of engine classes and instances, we can also use this instead of
the current awkward engine selection uAPI.
This is primarily interesting for the VCS engine selection which
is a) currently done via disjoint
From: Tvrtko Ursulin
Engine discovery uAPI allows userspace to probe for engine
configuration and features without needing to maintain the
internal PCI id based database.
This enables removal of code duplications across userspace
components.
Probing is done via the new
From: Tvrtko Ursulin
Building on top of the previous patch which exported the concept
of engine classes and instances, we can also use this instead of
the current awkward engine selection uAPI.
This is primarily interesting for the VCS engine selection which
is a) currently done via disjoint
On 27/04/2017 10:25, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 10:10:34AM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
From: Tvrtko Ursulin
Building on top of the previous patch which exported the concept
of engine classes and instances, we can also use this instead of
the current awkward engine selection
On 18/04/2017 22:10, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 05:56:15PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
From: Tvrtko Ursulin
Building on top of the previous patch which exported the concept
of engine classes and instances, we can also use this instead of
the current awkward engine selection
On 19/04/2017 06:22, Kenneth Graunke wrote:
On Tuesday, April 18, 2017 9:56:14 AM PDT Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
From: Tvrtko Ursulin
Engine discovery uAPI allows userspace to probe for engine
configuration and features without needing to maintain the
internal PCI id based database.
I don&#
On 18/04/2017 21:13, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 05:56:14PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
+enum drm_i915_gem_engine_class {
+ DRM_I915_ENGINE_CLASS_OTHER = 0,
+ DRM_I915_ENGINE_CLASS_RENDER = 1,
+ DRM_I915_ENGINE_CLASS_COPY = 2
From: Tvrtko Ursulin
Building on top of the previous patch which exported the concept
of engine classes and instances, we can also use this instead of
the current awkward engine selection uAPI.
This is primarily interesting for the VCS engine selection which
is a) currently done via disjoint
From: Tvrtko Ursulin
Engine discovery uAPI allows userspace to probe for engine
configuration and features without needing to maintain the
internal PCI id based database.
This enables removal of code duplications across userspace
components.
Probing is done via the new
From: Tvrtko Ursulin
Inspired by the recent introduction of the engine class and instance concept,
and a chat with Chris Wilson about a potential unification of PCI id based
device discovery across multiple userspace components, I have cooked up two
patches to gather some opinions on whether
40 matches
Mail list logo
