Hi Keith,
If I read the patch correctly, the plane has been interpreted as the same as
connector, and the stackIndex is the index of connector of current device.
Is it by intentional?
If the hardware don't have underlay/overlay supported, is it better to always
report plane 0 rather than pretend
Oh. I see. I was distracted by the hard coded 16!
Thanks.
Best Regards,
David
-Original Message-
From: Bas Nieuwenhuizen [mailto:b...@basnieuwenhuizen.nl]
Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2018 9:29 PM
To: Mao, David
Cc: mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH 2/2
ag for all combinations of four rectangles that
pixel could be finally determined as inside.
Thanks.
Best Regards,
David
-Original Message-
From: Bas Nieuwenhuizen [mailto:b...@basnieuwenhuizen.nl]
Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2018 5:59 PM
To: Mao, David
Cc: mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
S
Hi Bas,
If I read it correctly, you are trying to interpret the ClipRule as a mask.
You set the bit i if the ith rectangle is need to be inclusive.
Am I right?
IIRC, It is not a right interpretation.
Where did you read the register spec? I would like to take a look.
Thanks.
Best Regards,
Davi
Hi Bas,
AMD does not support ETC2 officially on the GFX9.
It would be risky for Radv to export that feature for gfx9 family.
Anyway, t’s just a heads up, and it is up to you to make the final call.
FYI: AMDVLK and proprietary AMD vulkan driver don’t’ support that.
Thanks.
Best Regards,
David
Hi Lothian,
Thanks for testing out out driver!
Officially we recommend you to stick to GCC5 for now, however, we do have a fix
for the constexpr issue mentioned below that just didn’t make it to this first
release.
According to your diff, are you using ICC?
Could you let us know the compiler vers
We are pleased to announce the initial release of AMD Open Source Driver for
Vulkan.
The AMD Open Source Driver for Vulkan is an open-source Vulkan driver for
Radeon graphics adapters on Linux. It is built on top of AMD's Platform
Abstraction Library (PAL), a shared component that is designed
Hi Daniel and Jammy,
I think we have off the track.
The motivation behind this thread is to see whether we could find a generally
agreed way for gbm to be able to load different gbm backend in the fly.
It would be very appreciated if we could get back to this topic and reach the
concur.
Regardi
