Hi;
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 3:46 PM, Brian Paul wrote:
> On 12/01/2011 07:36 AM, İsmail Dönmez wrote:
>
>> Hi;
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 8:08 PM, İsmail Dönmez > <mailto:ism...@namtrac.org>> wrote:
>>
>>Another thing to notice that nested f
Hi;
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 8:08 PM, İsmail Dönmez wrote:
> Another thing to notice that nested functions require executable stack.
> This is also another reason to get rid of them.
>
> On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 3:11 PM, İsmail Dönmez wrote:
>
>> Hi;
>>
>> nouveau
Another thing to notice that nested functions require executable stack.
This is also another reason to get rid of them.
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 3:11 PM, İsmail Dönmez wrote:
> Hi;
>
> nouveau_array.c seems to be using nested functions which is not supported
> by clang (or the EDG bas
Hi;
nouveau_array.c seems to be using nested functions which is not supported
by clang (or the EDG based compilers it seems), the reduced testcase looks
like this:
foo()
{
auto void f();
void f() {};
}
I talked to the clang developers and they don't plan to support this GNU
extension sin
