Hi Christian,
What are your plans for pushing this upstream? I see you've been
pushing r600g bug fixes lately.
Thanks for your work!
Matt
___
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 9:25 PM, Jose Fonseca wrote:
> The diagram looks sensible to me FWIW.
Great.
> But I'd like to point out though that spite the emergence of pipe_xxx.so and
> st_xxx.so dynamic drivers, the Gallium interface should remain a private
> interface of Mesa project. There is a l
Hi List,
I realize that you may well not have time to care about WebGL [1] or
Firefox. In that case, I'm still writing because there's a new test
suite, namely the WebGL conformance test suite, that may be of interest
to help find and fix bugs in OpenGL implementations.
The goal of this emai
From: Dave Airlie
This adds the get/enable enums and internal gl_config storage
for this extension.
In theory this is all that is needed to enable this extension
from what I can see, since its not mandatory to implement the
features if you don't advertise the visuals or the fb configs.
Signed-o
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33188
Summary: WebGL Conformance Test Runner crash
Product: Mesa
Version: git
Platform: Other
URL: https://cvs.khronos.org/svn/repos/registry/trunk/publi
c/webgl/sdk/tests/web
The diagram looks sensible to me FWIW.
But I'd like to point out though that spite the emergence of pipe_xxx.so and
st_xxx.so dynamic drivers, the Gallium interface should remain a private
interface of Mesa project. There is a lot of catching up necessary to support
newer GL extensions and othe
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33176
Chia-I Wu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33176
--- Comment #4 from Jos van Wolput 2011-01-16
04:42:58 PST ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Created an attachment (id=42099)
View: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=42099
Review: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/review?bug=33176&attachm
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33176
--- Comment #3 from Chia-I Wu 2011-01-16 03:59:17 PST ---
Created an attachment (id=42099)
View: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=42099
Review: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/review?bug=33176&attachment=42099
fix d3d1x again
Ah, s
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33176
--- Comment #2 from Jos van Wolput 2011-01-16
03:07:44 PST ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Does this patch help? I did not(/don't know how to) enable d3d1x to verify.
I applied your patch but get the following error:
---
src/dxgi_native.cpp: I
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 5:38 PM, Chia-I Wu wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 3:50 AM, Chia-I Wu wrote:
>> Since the same-dispatch-offset-different-glx-opcodes functions are
>> defined in GLX, glXGetProcAddress should be a better place to handle
>> them specially than _glapi_get_proc_address is. W
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33176
--- Comment #1 from Chia-I Wu 2011-01-16 01:37:08 PST ---
Created an attachment (id=42098)
View: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=42098
Review: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/review?bug=33176&attachment=42098
fix d3d1x
Does this p
12 matches
Mail list logo
